Nerd correspondent and podcast regular, Simon Evans, takes in an advance screening of Hancock and gives us the low-down straight up!
Some Superheroes are born – or mutated – into greatness while others have it thrust upon them. It’s the latter case with Hancock; the crustiest, crankiest and perhaps drunkiest superhero to hit the big screen this summer (sorry Robert Downey Jr. – take a seat buddy!)
You’ve probably all seen the trailer, but in case you haven’t, the story goes something a little like this: It’s all about superhero/superdrunk John Hancock (Will Smith) who is reluctantly goaded from his park bench and alcoholic stupor into fighting bad guys and saving helpless Los Angelians from certain death.
But, as the film points out right off the top, Hancock’s help comes at a hefty price, both financially and in terms of property damage, for the City of Angels. Add to that the personal risk to it’s citizens and the negative spin from the media, well – all that makes Hancock about as welcome as a shrimp ring at a Jewish wedding. In other words, Hancock’s efforts are less than well received by pretty much everyone.
Enter Ray Embrey (Jason Bateman); a goody-two-shoes PR makeover specialist who is rescued by a hung-over Hancock from impending doom at the hands – or, rather – wheels, of a speeding freight train (which, of course, Hancock wrecks… spotting a theme here yet? Yeah – we’ll get to “train wrecks” later…)
Ray decides to take the under appreciated, disrespectful superhero, under his wing, so to speak, with the offer of a campaign to turn the not so popular Johnny H. into a regular Superman! Spandex suit and all! So off they go back to Ray’s house to meet the wife (cutie-pie Charlize Theron) and the kid (ah – who cares who the kid is!)
So far so good. A somewhat genuinely charming idea. By this point, we’ve come to like Hancock (I mean all superheroes have problems right?) and we are intrigued by his mysterious origins and the fact that he lives in a shithole like L.A. when he could go pretty much anywhere in a heartbeat. And the drunk thing? Well, who hasn’t had one too many and been at home to Mr.Cock Up! We even like that he’s trading in the Jangle Juice for a jumpsuit and has started making friends and influencing people…
And now comes the “train wreck” part I spoke of earlier.
See there’s a “twist”. Or something. And it’s telegraphed early on by a baby-blue sideways glance from Ms Theron that has the subtlety of a smack in the face with a pillowcase of wet oranges – Ah! I get it! Seems that something is not what it seems with the Embreys and Hancock. That there’s maybe more to their chance meeting. And that’s when things get, shall we say, messy in more ways than one! (I’ll say no more as the word ‘spoiler’ comes to mind…)
It does seems, however, that director Peter Berg and writer Vince Gillian (X-writer for The X-Files) got a bit befuddled in the third act. The action takes a head-scratching right turn to a rousing chorus of “Oh, Come On!“s from the audience. It’s like they just plain ran out of ideas. Of course, it would be even more shocking to imagine that they didn’t just run out of ideas but, rather, this was the kind of ending they’d had imagined all the time.
I don’t know, maybe it’s just me, but I don’t think this was the “direction” to go in. Maybe they should have… uh… oh, hell, I dunno. See? Like the movie, I’ve just plain run out of ideas.
All in all? I think that Hancock is worth seeing. Maybe it’s just not worth seeing all of it!!